Click to Shop
February 26, 2014

Indoor 3k Controversy - A Letter to USATF


This last weekend was a crazy one for US Track and Field. If you don't know what I'm talking about, Google "women's indoor 3k controversy" or look at websites of Flotrack or RunBlogRun or USATF or really any running-related website in this country. Haven't seen the race? Time to watch the women's 3000m that causing all the stir, the contact in question is at the 10:10 mark if you want to fast forward through the 2:48 800m start. And while Gabe was reinstated as the winner, what is going on here? With the recent official USATF release, I had to speak up. I'm only echoing what hosts of others are concerned about, including @wizzo800 letter and @jongugala eyewitness and interview coverage from the meet (including very concerning Salazar allegations). I'll let you know if/when I hear back. Transparency is golden. 

Of course, the women's 3000m wasn't the only race with a questionable DQ, there was also the case of Bumbalough in the men's indoor 3000m. Read more on Spiked Up, Psyched Up.

There's no end to online coverage on this entire issue. But if you want the quick and dirty, the boys at Flotrack always have your back. Watch their hilarious spoof on enhanced footage in the women's 3000m.

And, fly fast @gg_runs and all of our other US Team representatives in Poland!

From: Sarah Lesko <>
Date: Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:47 PM
Subject: Concerned member of USATF
To: [email protected]

Hi Jill, 

I noticed on twitter that you are responding to emails so I feel compelled to write. Although this may be a wasted effort since you are being put in the difficult position of mediating between the public and USATF officials. I have many concerns with what transpired over the weekend, and the resulting USATF communication.

I am a life-long track and field enthusiast, was XC captain at Yale University, was 5th runner on our 3rd place NCAA Div 1 XC team, ran as an elite post-collegiately, and currently coach middle school XC and track and field. I am the health advisor for a group of professional women distance runners, and race as a competitive masters runner. I also serve as Corporate Developer for Oiselle, a women's running apparel company that sponsors elite and amateur runners. In short, I love this sport, devote a large amount of time and money to it daily, and feel physically ill that politics (or, at a minimum, incompetence) could un-do an athlete's well-earned successes.

First, the lack of professionalism displayed at the meet must have consequences. In the NBA, the NFL, WNBA, etc when a coach or player flagrantly violates social norms (such as verbally or physically attacking another player or coach), that individual must pay a fine and/or be barred from future competitions. At the very least, the USATF needs to conduct an independent investigation regarding the claims that one of the coaches verbally attacked and physically threatened another coach and that coach's athlete. There are scores of eyewitnesses who have been reporting on these events, as I'm sure you are well aware. For Lopez Lomong to state "I came from really far. I came from a lot in my life. I want to compete as much as I can for my country" when describing being verbally attacked by another athlete's coach in front of fans...that at a minimum warrants an investigation. We all need to feel safe and protected within the confines of a track and field competitive area. 

If the USATF ignores this aspect of the weekend's events, it will only reinforce our sport's inferior position. If we want to be treated as professionals, then we all need to act as professionals. The USATF states, re involved coaches, “Both are passionate people who passionately advocate for their athletes. And both want what is best for the sport and as well and its athletes." This can easily be interpreted as the USATF condoning or at a minimum excusing or overlooking extremely unprofessional behavior. The USATF needs to develop behavior standards and consequences, and apply them evenly and fairly. 

Next, regarding the appeals process, your website quotes: 

Our women’s track & field meet officials, who volunteer their time to serve the sport, made a field-of-play decision based on the video evidence they saw,” Siegel said. “They followed the process laid out in our competition rules, with no USATF employee or officer part of the appeal or the decision. We are all looking forward and will address our processes to try to minimize the potential for controversy or misunderstanding in the future.” 

So, am I correct in interpreting this statement to mean that USATF volunteers made a mistake, that they had insufficient oversight from the USATF, and that their disqualification was incorrect? If so, Jordan should not have needed to withdraw from the team for Gabe to be reinstated, the USATF officers should have been able to overturn it. Or is it still USATF official position that the disqualification was warranted? Do you see internal contradiction? Jordan's withdrawal let USATF off the hook from having to make a definitive statement on the DQ. Please make this position clear.

Finally, the lack of transparency of this "enlarged digital footage" you must be aware is just fueling conspiracy theories. Walk us through it if you are standing by your findings. Show us the footage. Let the video company release the footage and have an IAAF meet official talk through it. Let there be a debate on ground rules of contact in track races.That would make this weekend's events have some purpose. If there is no transparency, there will be no athlete or coach trust of the process going forward. And that will compromise our sport even more. 

The USATF has a serious if not fatal credibility problem right now, which is hurting our sport. Please take the necessary steps to at least allow this controversy to move us forward. I am hopeful that you will pass on this message to USATF officers who are able to make a positive impact. 


Sarah Lesko, MD MPH


Jon Gugala | February 26, 2014 at 10:15am

Sarah, I appreciate you

Sarah, I appreciate you stepping up as an industry leader to call for transparency and further investigation.

Kara Goucher | February 26, 2014 at 10:54am


Sarah, Written perfectly. No wasted emotion, just the facts. We need answers and you've laid out the questions crystal clear. Fingers crossed you get a response!! -Kara g

Kelly @ Running Kellometers | February 26, 2014 at 10:54am


I would love to hear if/when USATF responds to your email!!!

depicus | February 26, 2014 at 11:16am


And people are worried about drug cheats... USATF might as well just change their NIKEATF

Sarah Lesko | February 26, 2014 at 11:20am

Thanks, Jon. I appreciate you

Thanks, Jon. I appreciate you calling me an industry leader :) (Disclaimer: I'm just Sally's running monkey.)

Elizabeth | February 26, 2014 at 12:23pm

FYI - USATF's statement did

FYI - USATF's statement did not at all address Salazar's alleged verbal attack on Lomong and Schumacher. Their reference was actually to Salazar and Paul Doyle: Siegel’s conversations included Paul Doyle, Grunewald’s representative, and Alberto Salazar, Hasay’s coach who had filed the initial protest and subsequent appeals. Salazar made clear that Hasay felt withdrawal was the right thing to do, and with the agreement of all parties, Grunewald was reinstated. “I had productive discussions with both Paul and Alberto,” Siegel said. “Both are passionate people who passionately advocate for their athletes. And both want what is best for the sport and as well and its athletes.

Jon | February 27, 2014 at 10:33am

A few quick thoughts.

A few quick thoughts. 1. This controversy regarding the women's 3k event has absolutely nothing to do with Oiselle. Whatever the circumstances surrounding the initial contact and subsequent appeal/disqualification may be, they still do not involve Oiselle, or any of its athletes. 2. You cite and the twitter feed of Jon Gugala, which is both remarkable and ridiculous, as neither of these sources have even attempted objectivity regarding this much-blown-out-of-proportion incident. If your standards for a reliable source are the equivalent of tabloid fodder, you do not have legitimate cause to be writing USATF regarding unfounded allegations. 3. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the petition/DQ, none of what you have written acknowledges that there was a foul, or that the contact between Grunewald and Hasay could have impeded her in any way. What if it caused her to drop from a 3rd place finish to 4th? Is that not an impediment of her progress/finish? 4. You have curiously left no mention in your recap of the highly inappropriate twitter activity of your star athlete towards Jordan Hasay. Perhaps those with an axe to grind with their former employer should not be rushing towards judgment. 5. Unless you were a first-hand witness with respect to your allegations of improper conduct by Alberto Salazar, you are repeating and promoting, as facts, stories you do not know for certain to be 100% true. If you do not know things to be 100% true, you should not be posting them on the website of the company for which you work. Transparency is golden but should be demonstrated by both parties in every disagreement.

Sarah Lesko | February 27, 2014 at 10:41pm

Thanks Elizabeth. You are

Thanks Elizabeth. You are correct. I did not mean to infer that the passion cited was directly addressing the allegations re verbally attacking Lomong. Just that by referencing that the coaches were "passionate people" Siegel could inadvertently be signaling what is appropriate conduct.

Sarah Lesko | February 27, 2014 at 11:50pm

Thanks for your communication

Thanks for your communication Jon. I suspect we may have to agree to disagree here. Because Oiselle sponsors athletes who compete in national championships and USATF meets, the processes that affect world team choice, protests, and DQs do affect us and our athletes. I agree that Letsrun and Jon Gugala can be very inflammatory. I was not at the track meet, and I certainly do not know that any events as cited are 100% true, nor did I verify any first-hand sources or act as a reporter. However, I was alarmed by the number of independent and unrelated people who expressed surprise and concern about unprofessional conduct at the meet. I suppose everything reported, including quotes from athletes, could be a complete fabrication, but if that were the case I would hope the athletes involved would speak up to clear the record. My hope is that the USATF, as the national governing body of our sport, would share this concern and simply want to investigate what actually happened. If the bar for expressing concern about the ground rules for behavior at a USATF meet is set at 100% first-hand knowledge, then I will need to retract that portion of my letter and hope that any first-hand witnesses and/or participants write letters instead. I do not know whether a foul occurred or not. Hence the need to discuss and explain ground rules for contact. Oiselle has a policy of not censoring their athletes (regarding twitter) or employees (in my case). It was Oiselle's choice to post this letter on their blog, so I will pass on your criticism. One option is always to say nothing and do nothing. But frankly, that usually indicates a lack of caring, which would be incorrect in this instance. I believe that I have been 100% transparent in my history, my opinions, and my motivations. But since we seem to be having a disagreement, can you let me know how you are affiliated with track and field so I can better understand your viewpoint? Thanks again for taking the time to express your views. Sarah

Johnf47 | October 20, 2014 at 3:46am

Thanks again for the blog

Thanks again for the blog post.Thanks Again. Cool. aekegacddbed